Who Wrote Hebrews? Why It May Not Be Paul . . .

Bible scroll, unrolledBy Thomas Schreiner

Who wrote Hebrews? The short answer: only God knows. In the following excerpt adapted from Lexham Press’ new Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary volume: Hebrews by Thomas R. Schreiner,1 we see whose names have been put forward—and why the author of Hebrews probably isn’t Paul.

***

The authorship of Hebrews is a fascinating issue that continues to interest Christians today. 

Who put forward Pauline authorship of Hebrews?

Clement of Alexandria (ca. AD 150–215) thought the letter was written by Paul in Hebrew and then translated into Greek by Luke.2 

Origen (ca. AD 185–253) said the thoughts are Pauline but suggested someone else made short notes and wrote up what the apostle taught and said.3 Origen passed on the tradition that either Luke or Clement of Rome was the writer, but he remained noncommittal on the identity of the author. Most scholars believe Origen was agnostic about the author since he wrote, “But who wrote the epistle, truly only God knows.”4 

David Alan Black, however, argues Origen believed Paul was the author but someone else was the penman.5

Black’s interpretation of Origen should be rejected. It has been shown that when Origen speaks of who wrote the epistle he was referring to the author, not merely the secretary.6 Hence, the notion that Origen believed Paul was the author fails to persuade. 

As time passed, however, the notion that Paul was the author gained credence, and by the third century Pauline authorship was accepted in the East.7

The situation in the West was different. 

Tertullian (ca. AD 155–220) suggested that Barnabas was the author, which indicates there was no inclination in the early centuries in the West to ascribe the letter to Paul.8

Identifying the author as Barnabas is interesting since Barnabas was a Levite (Acts 4:36), which could explain the interest in and knowledge of priestly matters in Hebrews. Pauline authorship, however, finally triumphed in the West due to the influence of Jerome and Augustine.9

Views on Pauline authorship in the Reformation and today

Pauline authorship reigned as the view of the Church until the time of the Reformation. 

Erasmus inclined against Pauline authorship but said he would submit to ecclesiastical authorities since the matter was inconsequential.10

Luther rejected Pauline authorship, believing that Heb 2:3 proves the book could not have come from Paul. Luther had a novel but brilliant guess regarding authorship, proposing that the book was written by Apollos.11

Hebrews is beautifully written and has an Alexandrian feel, fitting with Apollos’s eloquence and Alexandrian roots (Acts 18:24). Calvin also agreed that Paul wasn’t the writer based on Heb 2:3, suggesting that either Luke or Clement of Rome penned the letter.

In the contemporary period, scholars continue to propose various authors, such as Priscilla, Silas, Epaphras, Jude, Aristion, etc.12 In recent years a vigorous defense of Lukan authorship has been proposed by David Allen,13 and there is also a significant defense of Pauline authorship by David Alan Black.14

Lexham Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary: "Paul would like this commentary!" —Simon Gathercole, University of Cambridge

Why Paul is not the author of Hebrews

Pauline authorship should be rejected despite the attempts, both ancient and modern, to mount a defense. 

First, in Paul’s 13 letters he identifies himself by name, thus the absence of a name in Hebrews renders it doubtful that Paul wrote the letter.15

Second, stylistic arguments should not be relied on too heavily since the Pauline corpus is so limited. Still, the polished Greek style of Hebrews doesn’t accord with what we find in the Pauline letters. 

Third, the writer separates himself from the original eyewitnesses in Heb 2:3. Paul, by way of contrast, emphasizes repeatedly his authority as an apostle of Jesus Christ and refuses to put himself in a subordinate position to the apostles and eyewitnesses. This last reason, in particular, rules out the notion that Paul was the author.

If not Paul, then who wrote Hebrews?

Once Paul is excluded, the door is pushed wide open for any number of candidates. 

David Allen argues intriguingly for Luke, but one can only say that he has shown that Lukan authorship is possible. He has certainly not proved his thesis. The linguistic evidence is not decisive, and the differences between Hebrews and Acts call into question Lukan authorship.16 

Barnabas is an attractive choice since he was a Levite, and the book has an interest in all things Levitical. 

Similarly, Luther’s guess that the author was Apollos is appealing, for Apollos’s eloquence accords with the letter’s elegance, and his Alexandrian background fits with the character of the letter. Many scholars have seen an affinity between Hebrews and Platonic/Philonic thought, and Alexandria was a fertile center for such thought. 

But we come face-to-face here with the paucity of evidence in assigning an author. 

All the theories are guesses, though some are fascinating and alluring to be sure. We don’t really know who wrote Hebrews. No theory of authorship has won the day and for good reason, for the answer to our quest lies outside the domain of historical knowledge. 

Origen’s words about the author still ring true today: “God only knows.” 

***

This post is adapted from Hebrews from the Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary (EBTC) series by Thomas R. Schreiner, coming soon from Lexham Press.  The title and headings above were added by an editor.

Pre-order the first six volumes in the EBTC series now to save 20% off the regular price. The following volumes are releasing by Summer 2021:

  • Hebrews by Thomas R. Schreiner
  • Psalms by James Hamilton
  • Romans by David G. Peterson
  • Daniel by Joe Sprinkle
  • 1–2 Timothy and Titus by Andreas Köstenberger
  • Joshua by David Firth
    "Paul would like this commentary!" —Simon Gathercole, University of Cambridge
  1. Schreiner, Thomas R. Hebrews, Evangelical Biblical Theological Commentary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2021), 2–5.
  2. Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 6.14.1.
  3. Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 6.25.13
  4. This is my translation of Eusebius, Hist. eccl. 6.25.14.
  5. David Alan Black, “Who Wrote Hebrews? The Internal and External Evidence Re-examined,” Faith and Mission 18 (2001): 3–26. See also David Alan Black, The Authorship of Hebrews: The Case for Paul (Gonzales, FL: Energion, 2013).

  6. See David L. Allen, Hebrews, NAC (Nashville: B&H, 2010), 32.
  7. See here Harold W. Attridge, The Epistle to the Hebrews, Hermeneia (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1989), 1–2, n7. See, e.g., Eusebius who accepts Hebrews as Pauline, though he thinks it was originally written in Hebrew and translated by Clement of Rome into Greek (Hist. eccl. 3.3.5 and 3.3.8.2–3).

  8. Attridge, Hebrews, 3.

  9. For the views of Jerome and Augustine, see Philip Edgecumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1977), 21–22.

  10. For Erasmus’s comments on Hebrews, see ibid., 23.

  11. Guthrie nicely summarizes the evidence favoring Apollos, and he also provides a historical overview of those who have supported Apollos as the author (including Zahn, Lenski, Montefiore). Guthrie is not dogmatic on the matter but suggests Apollos as the author. George H. Guthrie, “The Case for Apollos as the Author of Hebrews,” Faith and Mission 18 (2001): 41–56. For the development of Luther’s views, see Hughes, Hebrews, 23; Attridge, Hebrews, 4. In support of Apollos, see Ceslas Spicq, L’Epître aux Hébreux, 2nd ed., 2 vols., EB (Paris: Gabalda, 1953), 1:197–219.

  12. Adolf von Harnack defended Priscilla as the author (Adolf von Harnack, “Probabilia über die Addresse und den Verfasser des Hebräerbriefes,” ZNW 1 [1900]: 16–41). For Silas, see Thomas Hewitt, The Epistle to the Hebrews, TNTC (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1960), 26–32. For Epaphras, see Robert Jewett, Letter to Pilgrims: A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (New York: Pilgrim, 1981), 7–9.
  13. Allen, Hebrews, 29–61. David L. Allen, Lukan Authorship of Hebrews (Nashville: B&H, 2010).
  14. See note 4 above.
  15. See John Calvin, Commentaries on the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews, trans. J. Owen (repr.; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2005), 54, 358. Despite the title of the commentary (which doubtless doesn’t come from Calvin), Calvin clearly rejects Pauline authorship in his comments on 2:3 and 13:23.

  16. Rightly Gareth Lee Cockerill, The Epistle to the Hebrews, NICNT (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2012), 9.

Comments

  1. Origen was agnostic about the author since he wrote, “But who wrote the epistle, truly only God knows.” – Per Jn 16.24, We have not because we ask not. …So, why didn’t Origen ask God, in Jesus’ name?
    2nd, no author of Hebrews would dare ID himself or herself: The Jews would not likely seriously read anything by their traitor Saul. Nor, would an Orthodox scholar risk being expelled from the Synagogue. On another note, other than on the Damascus road, when did Saul have an eyewitness account of our Lord? Saul asked, ‘who art Thou Lord’. Hence, Luther’s Heb 2.3 argument does not hold water.

    • Deacon Rick Bauer says

      Gerald:

      I’m not a Lutheran, not even a Protestant anymore, but Luther’s argument against Pauline authorship of Hebrews, relying on Hebrews 2:3, has a certain cogency in light of the rest of the Pauline writings.

      We read (using NIV) in Hebrews “how shall we escape if we ignore so great a salvation? This salvation, which was first announced by the Lord, was confirmed to us by those who heard him.” Hebrews 2:3 (NIV)

      We have a sequence of authority that is being relayed by the epistle’s author, and the sequence was that the announcement of salvation was from Christ first, secondly from “those who heard him” [Christ] (and I would affirm that was in direct hearing), and then “to us” (which would include the author of the Epistle. In other words, Luther (and he was not the first) concluded that the author (whomever) was a 3rd-hand witness to Christ’s message of salvation.

      Given that Paul stated his apostleship and message (gospel) was not from man, but from God, that he was commissioned directly by Christ, and that he did not receive his bona fides from anyone else but Christ, it would appear somewhat difficult to reconcile the author of the Hebrew epistle with the same author of Romans or Galatians, who claimed to be an eyewitness of Christ.

      Given the beautiful Greek writing and structure of Hebrews, some reached out in the darkness and posited Apollos as the author, based on what Luke said about him in Acts. But we have nothing written by Apollos with which to compare to Hebrews, so it is an argument without any evidence, making the answer “truly God knows” or “only God knows.”

      • Amen! Deacon, your input, logic, and conclusion gives me much to ponder. Thanks! …Still, I remind myself that the Author & finisher of our faith is ultimately the Author of Scripture. That said, anyone writing Truth must be in touch with God via His Holy Spirit in Jesus’ name. Thanks Again.

  2. Deacon Rick Bauer says

    Nice summary article. I heard long ago from an expository preacher that the Origen quote “only God knows” could also be translated “truly God knows”, reflecting the unnamed author’s understanding of the work of Christ. But I also heard another preacher say, “if you have to go to the Greek to prove it, it’s ain’t so.” :) Would not want a little think like a translation get in the way of a good story.

  3. Dr. George Gallant says

    The Authorship is the Holy Spirit, so why should the human author matter, truth is truth no matter who speaks it. The Book of Hebrews speaks the truth. We get to concerned as to the Authorship of a book these days, and I believe the noble Bereans would only look at the content, and so should we.