Why Ruth Risked Everything by Staying with Naomi

ruth and naomi

It’s a heart-rending scene: Their husbands are dead. Their prospects in Moab are bleak. But a rumor stirs in the fields: The devastating famine that brought Naomi and her daughters-in-law from Bethlehem to Moab has ended. It’s time for Naomi to go home.

Naomi’s daughters-in-law Ruth and Orpah insist on returning with her to Judah, but Naomi urges them to remain with their families in Moab. Orpah tearfully follows Naomi’s wishes, but Ruth emphatically refuses. “Where you go I will go, and where you lodge I will lodge,” she insists. “Your people shall be my people, and your God my God” (Ruth 1:16).

Ruth’s devotion to her mother-in-law is beautiful and inspiring. But by remaining with Naomi, she makes a profound personal sacrifice. To really understand the tremendous risk Ruth took by sticking with Naomi, we need to understand the relationship between the people of Israel and Moab.

Exploring Ruth with the Factbook

How might Ruth’s identity as a Moabite affect her experience in Judah? I can find the answer by studying other events involving the people and region of Moab—and the Factbook in Logos 6 helps me quickly find those passages. If you don’t have Logos 6, stick around—the insights I uncover here will help you grasp just how profound Ruth’s decision to stick with Naomi really was. (And by the way, consider taking our free 30-Day Bible study course. Not only will it show you how to uncover insights like these for yourself, you’ll learn a bit more about Logos , too)

In Logos 6, I select “Factbook” from the Tools menu and then type “Moab” in the search bar. Logos pulls up media, library results, dictionary articles, and more from across my library. One of the results under the category “Events” catches my eye: Numbers 21–25 records numerous incidents involving Israel and Moab.

ruth bible study

When I click on the hyperlinked text, the passages open in my preferred Bible translation. I read that Israel, while journeying to the promised land, defeated Sihon, the king of the Amorites (Num 21:21–31). Fearing a similar fate, the Moabite king Balak hired the prophet Balaam to pronounce a curse on Israel (Num 22). But Balaam, confronted by the living God of the Israelites, instead declared favor on Israel before God, and in so doing infuriated Balak (Num 24:10). Deuteronomy 23:3 declares that the Moabites were forbidden from entering “the assembly of the Lord” because of the actions of Balak and Balaam. Clearly, this early incident overshadowed the relationship between these two nations.

I also discover that the Israelites intermarried with the Moabites and began worshiping Moabite gods. In Numbers 25, God commanded Moses to stamp out the Moabite influence: “Take all the chiefs of the people and hang them in the sun before the Lord, that the fierce anger of the Lord may turn away from Israel” (Num 25:4). Surely such history would have caused any Moabite to hesitate at Israel’s borders.

As I continue to consult events from the Factbook and read corresponding biblical passages, I also discover that the Moabite king Eglon formed an alliance with the Ammonites and Amalekites in the period of the judges. Together, they rose up against Israel and subjected them to a humiliating defeat. God thwarted the Moabite menace through the judge Ehud, who assassinated Eglon (Judg 3).

These examples convince me that Moab and Israel had a troubled relationship. When I consult Factbook results from dictionaries, I find this to be true. The article “Moab, Moabites” in Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, for instance, confirms that the two nations warred off and on throughout their history, just as I suspected.

ruth bible study

Understanding this tumultuous history puts Ruth’s words in Ruth 1:16–17 in context. Her devotion to Naomi came with a cost. She left her own people to live in another land where, at best, she would be considered an outsider—at worst, an enemy.

Think about that.

Ruth knew of the tumultuous history these nations shared, but she was willing to stick it out with Naomi anyway. Her determination to remain with Naomi tells us much about her character and her love for her mother-in-law.

Learn how to study the Bible for yourself with our free, 10 Day training course! Featuring 10 easy-to-understand videos, this course will walk you through the three essential steps of inductive Bible study—from observation to interpretation and application. Sign up below or learn more about the free course.

A version of this article originally appeared in the Mar–Apr 2016 issue of Bible Study Magazine with the title “Bible Study with Logos 6: Uncovering Ruth’s Sacrifice.”


  1. Donald L Davis says:

    Ruth is a reminding symbol of Naomi’s complete failure as now a widow without any hope of being among God’s inheritance family. This is symbolic of the lost condition of orphans and widows. Ruth is symbolic of Naomi’s complete failure that followed Naomi wherever she went, even to her own land.

    • David Benjamin says:


      Did you take into account that in Naomi’s day and culture everything revolved around her husband, Elimelech, the man of the house. She had to do what she was told and go where her husband decided the family should go.
      The fact that she is destitute in a foreign land does not in this case make “her” a complete failure, although she may have felt like one.

      Her condition of destitution may be symbolic of the condition of widows and orphans but it is not the main point of the story.

      Ruth, on the other hand, from my point of view, is more symbolic of the bond of friendship that was forged between her and Naomi, and also the strong faith that Naomi lived out in spite of the death of her husband, and then the deaths of her two sons after they had married Moabite women( not because of it).

      God was faithful to His plan of salvation to bring Ruth, a righteous woman, to meet Boaz and eventually marry Boaz and redeem Naomi, not to mention being brought into Jesus ancestral bloodline.

      Man proposes, in this case Elimelech, but Gos disposes.

  2. Johnny Sewell says:

    I read “The Gospel of Ruth” last year by Carolyn Custis James last year. Very good I thought. Naomi or Job?


  3. David Benjamin says:

    One of the factors at play in this story is the definition/timespan of a “generation”. Looking at the dating of the writing of the books of Deuteronomy and Ruth shows that 10 generations would pass if a generation was 40 yrs or smaller, which would lend credibility to the word of God.

    Also key to Ruth pivotal statement is the witness of Naomi’s faith in the Hebrew God while in Moab which, though not revealed in the story, has had to have a great impact on Ruth’s decision to renounce everything and accompany Naomi.

  4. ManilaDave says:

    2:10 Ruth41 knelt before him with her forehead to the ground42 and said to him, “Why are you so kind and so attentive to me, even though I am a foreigner?”2:11 Boaz replied to her, “I have been given a full report of all that you have done for your mother-in-law following the death of your husband—how you left your father and your mother, as well as your homeland, and came to live among people you did not know previously.

    Biblical Studies Press, The NET Bible First Edition; Bible. English. NET Bible.; The NET Bible (Biblical Studies Press, 2005), Ru 2:10–11.

    Here Ruth’s faith echoes that of Abraham who also left his father’s house and homeland to go to the land of Israel.