Greek Syntax: Searching OpenText.org Material

I’ve briefly discussed searching OpenText.org material at the word level; this post discusses searching at the clause level, with word group level stuff in the mix.

There’s even a groovy video of the search I describe so you can see exactly what’s going on (see bottom of this article). One take, no cuts. This is done with the current beta version of Logos Bible Software (3.0 Beta 1) and an extra syntax searching component currently in development.


I’m looking at James 1.19, specifically ??? ????????. If I’m interested in searching further on the use of the term ???????? in similar situations, one approach is to search for the lexical form ???????? and see what happens. But there are over 500 instances of this, and I’d rather not filter through the list. I could search for combinations of lexical forms ??? and ???????? in proximity, but that ties me to using ??? to further define ????????, and I’m interested in the general definition relationship, not specifically the term “all people” or “all men”. For instance, what about “no men”? Or “some people”?

This is where the OpenText.org Analysis shines. If I consult the Word Analysis, I note that ??? functions as a definer, modifying ???????? in a particular manner. This relationship can be queried. But that’s not all — if I consult the Clause Analysis, I see that ??? ???????? is the subject of the clause.

This means that I can search for a Subject clause component that contains a word group that specifies a modification relationship between a definer and the head term ????????. I am creating a tree-like structure, much like that of the syntax graph, to query the syntax information for the sort of thing I’m looking for. Like the image below. Compare the syntax graph structure with the structure implied by the levels and arrows in the query dialog (left pane of the search dialog).

Instead of 500+ instances to examine, one now has 25 instances to work through. A video of the specification, search, and display of some results is available as a video presentation (1024×768, Flash, approx. 1.5 megs).

Note particularly the Syntax Search Results window displayed in the video. The Greek text is in the middle column. The shaded background represents the extent of the structure found — in this case, the extent of the subject clause component. The red text is text that was specified for “highlighting” in the search dialog (watch the video again, you’ll see me check the option after specifying the modifier).

The column on the right is the text of the English Standard Version (ESV) New Testament that has been aligned with the Greek on a word-by-word basis. The search hit highlighting means the same thing in that column.

Please take careful note of this. We specified a search of the Greek syntactic structure, along with Greek words. Those hits were found in the Greek text. But because of alignment work we’ve done, we can now represent those hits in Greek and in English, at the word level. Yes, we’re doing similar work in the Hebrew, though it has not quite matured to the point that the Greek has (hey, the Hebrew Bible is 3x bigger than the Greek NT!)

When the text in the ESV column is clicked, the search hit is retrieved and displayed in the ESV New Testament Reverse Interlinear. You can see the same highlighting taking place; shaded background representing the extent of the subject clause component; red text indicating the “highlighted” term, in this case the modifier. In this search, the various terms that modify the head term ???????? as preceding definers are red. Items like “all” men, “which” people, “every” person and the like are the sorts of things that are located with this search.

Video: 1024×768, Flash, approx. 1.5 megs.

Let us know what you think!

Comments

  1. John Fidel says:

    I think the ESV Reverse Interlinear is a great idea for making this tool useful to those that only have “baby Greek” skills, to coin a phrase from William Mounce.
    Keep the education regarding these tools and their application coming…

  2. David Phillips says:

    This just keeps getting better! The search dialogue looks quite easy to use. I do have one question though. In the search dialogue, under Head Term 1, what does the “primary = true” label refer to? Is it that it is in a primary clause, rather than an embedded clause? How would the search change if “false” were checked? Thanks! Keep up the great work.

  3. Hi David.
    The ‘primary = true’ part is actually a remnant of something that will not be in the final version. It was a distinction that I made when processing the word group data that, upon further reflection, really isn’t there. All head terms are ‘primary’, so there is no need for it. I don’t believe this option will be available in the shipping form of the OpenText.org data because it really isn’t necessary.

  4. John Fidel says:

    Rick, regarding the ESV reverse interlinear, did William Mounce do it? Will it include the OT and the NT?
    Will it be available separately from the syntax tools? I have wanted a reverse interlinear on one of the more modern translations.
    Thanks

  5. Pastor Christopher Holmes says:

    I love this